The effect of financial leverage is the optimal value. Financial leverage (leverage)


“The success of long-term lending in any area of ​​business depends on a clear understanding of what cannot be trusted in the accounts,” Robert Jackson, US Supreme Court Justice.

So, let's figure out what the success of lending depends on, and what is the role of reporting in this matter.

Loans are a double-edged sword.

Their inefficient use can lead to an increase in debt, inability to pay off it and, as a result, to bankruptcy.

And vice versa, with the help of borrowed funds, you can also increase the company's own funds, but subject to skilful management, competent and timely control over such an indicator as leverage financial leverage.

The formula for its calculation and the role in assessing the effectiveness of the use of borrowed funds are in the article.

Financial Leverage: Calculation Formula

The financial leverage of an enterprise (analogue: leverage, credit leverage, financial leverage, leverage) - shows how the use of borrowed capital of an enterprise affects the amount of net profit. Financial leverage is one of key concepts financial and investment analysis of the enterprise.


In physics, using a lever allows you to lift more weight with less effort. A similar principle of action in the economy for financial leverage, which allows you to increase profits with less effort.

The purpose of using financial leverage is to increase the profit of the enterprise by changing the structure of capital: the shares of own and borrowed funds. It should be noted that an increase in the share of borrowed capital (short-term and long-term liabilities) of an enterprise leads to a decrease in its financial independence.

But at the same time, with the increase in the financial risk of the enterprise, the possibility of obtaining greater profits also increases.

economic sense

The effect of financial leverage is explained by the fact that attracting additional funds makes it possible to increase the efficiency of the production and economic activities of the enterprise. After all, the attracted capital can be directed to the creation of new assets that will increase both the cash flow and the net profit of the enterprise.

Additional cash flow leads to an increase in the value of the enterprise for investors and shareholders, which is one of the strategic objectives for the company's owners.

The effect of the financial leverage of the enterprise

The effect of financial leverage is the product of the differential (with a tax corrector) times the leverage. The figure below shows a diagram of the key links in the formation of the effect of financial leverage.


If you paint the three indicators included in the formula, then it will look like this:

where DFL is the effect of financial leverage;
T- interest rate income tax;
ROA - return on assets of the enterprise;
r – interest rate on attracted (borrowed) capital;
D - borrowed capital of the enterprise;
E - equity capital of the enterprise.

So, let's analyze in more detail each of the elements of the effect of financial leverage.

tax corrector

The tax corrector shows how a change in the income tax rate affects the effect of financial leverage. Everyone pays income tax legal entities RF (LLC, OJSC, CJSC, etc.), and its rate may vary depending on the type of activity of the organization.

So, for example, for small enterprises engaged in the housing and communal sector, the final income tax rate will be 15.5%, while the unadjusted income tax rate is 20%. The minimum income tax rate by law cannot be lower than 13.5%.

Differential of financial leverage

The financial leverage differential (Dif) is the difference between the return on assets and the rate on borrowed capital. In order for the effect of financial leverage to be positive, it is necessary that the profitability equity was higher than the interest on loans and advances.

With a negative financial leverage, the enterprise begins to suffer losses, because it cannot provide production efficiency higher than the payment for borrowed capital.

Differential value:

  • Dif > 0 - The company increases the amount of profit received through the use of borrowed funds
  • Dif = 0 - Profitability is equal to the interest rate on the loan, the effect of financial leverage is zero

Financial leverage ratio

The coefficient of financial leverage (analogue: the shoulder of the financial leverage) shows what share in the total capital structure of the enterprise is occupied by borrowed funds (credits, loans, and other obligations), and determines the strength of the influence of borrowed capital on the effect of financial leverage.

Optimal leverage for the effect of financial leverage

On the basis of empirical data, the optimal leverage (debt-to-equity ratio) for an enterprise was calculated, which is in the range from 0.5 to 0.7. This suggests that the share of borrowed funds in the overall structure of the enterprise ranges from 50% to 70%.

With an increase in the share of borrowed capital, financial risks increase: the possibility of losing financial independence, solvency and the risk of bankruptcy. If the amount of borrowed capital is less than 50%, the company misses the opportunity to increase profits. Optimal size the effect of financial leverage is considered to be a value equal to 30-50% of the return on assets (ROA).

Source: "finzz.ru"

Financial leverage ratio

To assess the financial stability of an enterprise in the long term, in practice, the indicator (coefficient) of financial leverage (CFL) is used. The financial leverage ratio is the ratio of borrowed funds of an enterprise to its own funds (capital). This coefficient is close to the coefficient of autonomy.

The concept of financial leverage is used in economics to show that, using borrowed capital, an enterprise forms a financial leverage to increase profitability and return on equity. The financial leverage ratio directly reflects the level of financial risk of the enterprise.

Formula for calculating the financial leverage ratio

Financial Leverage Ratio = Liabilities / Equity

By liabilities, various authors understand either the sum of short-term and long-term liabilities or only long-term liabilities. Investors and business owners prefer more high ratio financial leverage, because it provides a higher rate of return.

Lenders, on the contrary, invest in enterprises with a lower financial leverage ratio, since this enterprise is financially independent and has a lower risk of bankruptcy.

The financial leverage ratio is more accurately calculated not by the company's balance sheets, but by the market value of assets.

Since the value of an enterprise is often market value, the value of assets exceeds the book value, which means that the level of risk of this enterprise is lower than when calculating the book value.

Financial Leverage Ratio = (Long Term Liabilities + Short Term Liabilities) / Equity

Financial Leverage Ratio = Long-Term Liabilities / Equity

If the financial leverage ratio (CFL) is written by factors, then according to G.V. The Savitsky formula will look like this:

CFL = (Share of Debt in Total Assets) / (Share of Fixed Capital in Total Assets) / (Share of Working Capital in Total Assets) / (Share of Equity Working Capital in Current Assets) * Equity Maneuverability)

The effect of financial leverage (leverage)

The financial leverage ratio is closely related to the financial leverage effect, which is also referred to as financial leverage effects. The effect of financial leverage shows the rate of increase in the return on equity with an increase in the share of borrowed capital.

Leverage Effect = (1- Income Tax Rate) * (Gross Margin Ratio - Average Interest on a Company Loan) * (Amount of Borrowed Capital) / (Amount of Equity of a Company)

(1-Income tax rate) is a tax corrector - shows the relationship between the effect of financial leverage and various tax regimes.

(Gross Margin Ratio - Average Interest on a Business Loan) represents the difference between the profitability of production and the average interest on loans and other liabilities.

(Amount of borrowed capital) / (Amount of own capital of an enterprise) is a coefficient of financial leverage (leverage) that characterizes the capital structure of an enterprise and the level of financial risk.

Normative values ​​of the financial leverage ratio

The normative value in domestic practice is the value of the leverage ratio equal to 1, that is, equal shares of both liabilities and equity.

In developed countries, as a rule, the leverage ratio is 1.5, that is, 60% of debt and 40% of equity.

If the coefficient is greater than 1, then the company finances its assets at the expense of borrowed funds from creditors; if it is less than 1, then the company finances its assets from its own funds.

Also, the normative values ​​of the financial leverage ratio depend on the industry of the enterprise, the size of the enterprise, the capital intensity of production, the period of existence, the profitability of production, etc. Therefore, the coefficient should be compared with similar enterprises in the industry.

Companies with a predictable cash flow for goods, as well as organizations with a high share of highly liquid assets, can have high values ​​of the financial leverage ratio.

Source: "beintrend.ru"

Financial Leverage

The shoulder of the financial lever characterizes the strength of the impact of the financial leverage - this is the ratio between borrowed (LL) and own funds(SS).

The selection of these components allows you to purposefully manage the change in the effect of financial leverage in the formation of the capital structure.

So, if the differential has a positive value, then any increase in the financial leverage, i.e. an increase in the share of borrowed funds in the capital structure will lead to an increase in its effect.

Accordingly, the higher the positive value of the financial leverage differential, the higher, other things being equal, its effect will be. However, the growth of the effect of financial leverage has certain limits, and it is necessary to realize the deep contradiction and inseparable connection between the differential and the leverage of financial leverage.

In the process of increasing the share of borrowed capital, the level of financial stability of the enterprise decreases, which leads to an increase in the risk of its bankruptcy. This forces lenders to increase the level of lending rates, taking into account the inclusion of an increasing premium for additional financial risk.

This increases the average calculated interest rate, which (at a given level of economic return on assets) leads to a reduction in the differential.

With a high value of the leverage of financial leverage, its differential can be reduced to zero, at which the use of borrowed capital does not increase the return on equity.

At negative value differential, the return on equity will decrease, since part of the profit generated by equity capital will be spent on servicing the borrowed capital used at high interest rates for the loan. Thus, attracting additional borrowed capital is advisable only if the level of economic profitability of the enterprise exceeds the cost of borrowed funds.

The calculation of the effect of financial leverage makes it possible to determine the marginal limit of the share of the use of borrowed capital for specific enterprise, calculate acceptable credit conditions.

Source: "center-yf.ru"

Degree of financial leverage (DFL) effect

The effect of financial leverage is an indicator that reflects the change in the return on equity obtained through the use of borrowed funds and is calculated using the following formula:


where DFL is the effect of financial leverage, in percent;
t is the income tax rate, in relative value;
ROA — return on assets (economic profitability on EBIT) in %;
r — interest rate on borrowed capital, in %;
D - borrowed capital;
E - equity.

The effect of financial leverage is manifested in the difference between the cost of borrowed and allocated capital, which allows you to increase the return on equity and reduce financial risks.

Positive effect financial leverage is based on the fact that the bank rate in a normal economic environment is lower than the return on investment. Negative effect (or back side financial leverage) appears when the return on assets falls below the loan rate, which leads to accelerated losses.

Incidentally, the commonly held theory is that the US subprime crisis was a manifestation of the negative effect of financial leverage.

When the program of non-standard mortgage lending was launched, interest rates on loans were low, while real estate prices were growing. The low-income strata of the population were involved in financial speculation, since almost the only way for them to repay the loan was the sale of housing that had risen in price.

When housing prices crept down, and loan rates rose due to increasing risks (the leverage began to generate losses, not profits), the pyramid collapsed.

Calculation of the effect of financial leverage

The effect of financial leverage (DFL) is the product of two components adjusted by a tax factor (1 - t), which shows the extent to which the effect of financial leverage is manifested due to different levels of income tax.

One of the main components of the formula is the so-called financial leverage differential (Dif) or the difference between the return on the company's assets (economic profitability), calculated on EBIT, and the interest rate on borrowed capital:

Dif = ROA - r,

where r is the interest rate on borrowed capital, in %;
ROA - return on assets (economic profitability on EBIT) in%.

The financial leverage differential is the main condition that forms the growth of return on equity. For this, it is necessary that the economic profitability exceed the interest rate of payments for the use of borrowed sources of financing, i.e. the financial leverage differential must be positive.

If the differential becomes less than zero, then the effect of financial leverage will only act to the detriment of the organization.

The second component of the effect of financial leverage is the coefficient of financial leverage (shoulder of financial leverage - FLS), which characterizes the strength of the impact of financial leverage and is defined as the ratio of borrowed capital (D) to equity (E):

Thus, the effect of financial leverage consists of the influence of two components: differential and leverage.

The differential and lever arm are closely interconnected. As long as the return on investment in assets exceeds the price of borrowed funds, i.e. the differential is positive, the return on equity will grow the faster, the higher the ratio of borrowed and own funds.

However, as the share of borrowed funds grows, their price rises, profits begin to decline, as a result, the return on assets also falls and, therefore, there is a threat of obtaining a negative differential.

According to economists, based on a study of the empirical material of successful foreign companies, the optimal effect of financial leverage is within 30-50% of the level of economic return on assets (ROA) with a financial leverage of 0.67-0.54. In this case, an increase in the return on equity is ensured not lower than the increase in the profitability of investments in assets.

The effect of financial leverage contributes to the formation of a rational structure of the sources of funds of the enterprise in order to finance the necessary investments and obtain the desired level of return on equity, in which the financial stability of the enterprise is not violated.

Using the above formula, we will calculate the effect of financial leverage.


The calculation results presented in the table show that by attracting borrowed capital, the organization was able to increase the return on equity by 9.6%.

Financial leverage characterizes the possibility of increasing the return on equity and the risk of loss of financial stability. The higher the share of borrowed capital, the higher the sensitivity of net income to changes in balance sheet profit. Thus, with additional borrowing, the return on equity may increase, provided:

if ROA > i, then ROE > ROA and ΔROE = (ROA - i) * D/E

Therefore, it is advisable to attract borrowed funds if the achieved return on assets ROA exceeds the interest rate for loan i. Then an increase in the share of borrowed funds will increase the return on equity.

However, at the same time, it is necessary to monitor the differential (ROA - i), since with an increase in the leverage of financial leverage (D / E), lenders tend to compensate for their risk by increasing the rate for the loan. The differential reflects the lender's risk: the larger it is, the lower the risk.

The differential should not be negative, and the effect of financial leverage should optimally be equal to 30-50% of the return on assets, since the stronger the effect of financial leverage, the higher the financial risk of loan default, falling dividends and share prices.

The level of associated risk characterizes the operational and financial leverage. Operating and financial leverage, along with the positive effect of increasing the return on assets and equity as a result of growth in sales and borrowings, also reflects the risk of lower profitability and incurring losses.

Source: "afdanalyse.ru"

Financial leverage (financial leverage)

Financial leverage (financial leverage) is the ratio of a company's borrowed capital to its own funds, it characterizes the degree of risk and stability of the company. The smaller the financial leverage, the more stable the position. On the other hand, borrowed capital allows you to increase the return on equity, i.e. earn additional return on equity.

An indicator that reflects the level of additional profit when using borrowed capital is called the effect of financial leverage. It is calculated using the following formula:

EGF \u003d (1 - Sn) × (KR - Sk) × ZK / SK,

where EFR is the effect of financial leverage, %.
Cn - income tax rate, in decimal terms.
KR - return on assets ratio (the ratio of gross profit to the average value of assets),%.
Sk - the average size interest rates for loans, %. For a more accurate calculation, you can take the weighted average rate for the loan.
ZK - average amount used borrowed capital.
SC - the average amount of equity capital.

The formula for calculating the effect of financial leverage contains three factors:

  1. (1-Sn) - does not depend on the enterprise.
  2. (KR-SK) - the difference between the return on assets and the interest rate for a loan. It is called differential (D).
  3. (LC/SK) - financial leverage (FR).

Let's write the formula for the effect of financial leverage in short:

EGF \u003d (1 - Cn) × D × FR.

2 conclusions can be drawn:

  • The effectiveness of the use of borrowed capital depends on the ratio between the return on assets and the interest rate for the loan. If the rate for a loan is higher than the return on assets, the use of borrowed capital is unprofitable.
  • Ceteris paribus, greater financial leverage produces greater effect.

Source: "finances-analysis.ru"

Methods for calculating financial leverage

First way

The essence of financial leverage is manifested in the impact of debt on the profitability of the enterprise. Grouping expenses in the income statement into production and financial expenses allows us to identify two main groups of factors affecting profit:

  1. the volume, structure and efficiency of managing costs associated with the financing of current and non-current assets;
  2. the volume, structure and cost of sources of financing of the enterprise's funds.

Based on the profit indicators, the profitability indicators of the enterprise are calculated. Thus, the volume, structure and cost of funding sources affect the profitability of the enterprise. Enterprises resort to various sources of financing, including through the placement of shares or the attraction of loans and borrowings.

Attracting equity capital is not limited by any timeframe, so a joint-stock company considers the attracted funds of shareholders to be its own capital. Raising funds through loans and borrowings is limited to certain periods. However, their use helps to maintain control over the management of a joint stock company, which can be lost due to the emergence of new shareholders.

An enterprise can operate by financing its expenses only from its own capital, but no enterprise can operate solely on borrowed funds. As a rule, the enterprise uses both sources, the ratio between which forms the structure of the liability.

The structure of liabilities is called the financial structure, the structure of long-term liabilities is called the capital structure. Thus, the capital structure is an integral part of the financial structure. Long-term liabilities that make up the capital structure and include equity and long-term borrowed capital are called fixed capital.

Capital structure = financial structure - short-term debt = long-term liabilities (constant capital).

When forming the financial structure (the structure of liabilities in general), it is important to determine:

  • the ratio between long-term and short-term borrowings;
  • the share of each of the long-term sources (own and borrowed capital) as a result of liabilities.

The use of borrowed funds as a source of asset financing creates the effect of financial leverage.

The effect of financial leverage: the use of long-term borrowed funds, despite their payment, leads to an increase in the return on equity.

The profitability of an enterprise is assessed using profitability ratios, including profitability ratios for sales, return on assets (profit/asset) and return on equity (profit/equity). The relationship between the return on equity and the return on assets indicates the importance of the company's debt.

Return on equity ratio (in the case of using borrowed funds) = profit - interest on debt repayment borrowed capital / equity capital.

The cost of debt can be expressed in relative and absolute terms, i.e. directly in interest accrued on a loan or loan, and in monetary terms - the amount of interest payments, which is calculated by multiplying the remaining amount of the debt by the interest rate reduced to the period of use.

Return on assets = profit / assets.

Let's transform this formula to get the profit value:

Profit = return on assets assets.

Assets can be expressed in terms of the value of their funding sources, i.e. through long-term liabilities (the sum of own and borrowed capital):

Assets = equity + debt capital.

Substitute the resulting expression of assets into the profit formula:

Profit = return on assets (equity + debt).

And finally, we substitute the resulting expression of profit into the previously converted formula for return on equity:

Return on equity = return on assets ratio (equity + borrowed capital) - interest on debt repayment borrowed capital / equity capital.

Return on equity = return on assets equity + return on assets borrowed capital - interest on debt repayment borrowed capital / equity capital.

Return on equity \u003d return on assets equity + debt (ROA - interest on debt) / equity.

Thus, the value of the return on equity increases with the growth of debt as long as the value of the return on assets is higher than the interest rate on long-term borrowed funds. This phenomenon is called the effect of financial leverage.

For an enterprise that finances its activities only from its own funds, the return on equity is approximately 2/3 of the return on assets; an enterprise using borrowed funds has 2/3 of the return on assets plus the effect of financial leverage.

At the same time, the return on equity increases or decreases depending on the change in the capital structure (the ratio of own and long-term borrowed funds) and the interest rate, which is the cost of attracting long-term borrowed funds. This is where financial leverage comes into play.

Quantification the force of financial leverage is carried out using the following formula:

Strength of financial leverage = 2/3 (return on assets - interest rate on loans and borrowings) (long-term debt / equity).

It follows from the above formula that the effect of financial leverage occurs when there is a discrepancy between the return on assets and the interest rate, which is the price (cost) of long-term borrowed funds. In this case, the annual interest rate is reduced to the period of use of the loan and is called the average interest rate.

Average interest rate = the sum of interest on all long-term credits and loans for the analyzed period / the total amount of attracted credits and loans in the analyzed period 100%.

The formula for the effect of financial leverage includes two main indicators:

  1. the difference between the return on assets and the average, interest rate, called the differential;
  2. the ratio of long-term debt to equity, called the leverage.

Based on this, the formula for the effect of financial leverage can be written as follows:

The force of financial leverage = 2/3 of the leverage differential.

After taxes are paid, 2/3 of the differential remains. The formula for the impact of financial leverage, taking into account taxes paid, can be represented as follows:

The strength of the impact of financial leverage = (1 - profit tax rate) 2/3 of the differential x leverage.

It is possible to increase the profitability of own funds through new borrowings only by controlling the state of the differential, the value of which can be:

  • positive if the return on assets is higher than the average interest rate (the effect of financial leverage is positive);
  • equal to zero if the return on assets is equal to the average interest rate (the effect of financial leverage is zero);
  • negative if the return on assets is below the average interest rate (the effect of financial leverage is negative).

Thus, the value of the return on equity will increase as borrowed funds increase until the average interest rate becomes equal to the value of the return on assets.

At the moment of equality of the average interest rate and the return on assets, the effect of the lever will “turn over”, and with a further increase in borrowed funds, instead of increasing profits and increasing profitability, there will be real losses and unprofitability of the enterprise.

Like any other indicator, the level of financial leverage effect should have an optimal value.

It is believed that optimal level is equal to 1/3 - 2/3 of the value of return on assets.

Second way

By analogy with the production (operational) leverage, the impact force of the financial leverage can be defined as the ratio of the rate of change in net and gross profit:

The strength of the impact of financial leverage is the rate of change in net profit / the rate of change in gross profit.

In this case, the strength of the impact of financial leverage implies the degree of sensitivity of net profit to changes in gross profit.

Third way

Financial leverage can also be defined as the percentage change in net income per ordinary share outstanding due to a change in the net result of the investment operation (earnings before interest and taxes):

Strength of financial leverage = percentage change in net profit per ordinary share in circulation / percentage change in the net result of investment exploitation.

Consider the indicators included in the formula of financial leverage.

The concept of earnings per ordinary share in circulation:

Net income ratio per share outstanding = net income - amount of dividends on preferred shares / number of ordinary shares outstanding.

Number of common shares in circulation = total number of common shares outstanding - treasury common shares in the company's portfolio.

The earnings per share ratio is one of the most important indicators affecting the market value of a company's shares. However, it must be remembered that:

  1. profit is an object of manipulation and, depending on the methods used accounting can be artificially overestimated (FIFO method) or underestimated (LIFO method);
  2. the direct source of dividend payment is not profit, but cash;
  3. By buying up its own shares, the company reduces their number in circulation, and therefore increases the amount of profit per share.

The concept of the net result of the operation of the investment. Western financial management uses four main indicators that characterize the financial performance of an enterprise:

  • added value;
  • gross result of exploitation of investments;
  • net result of exploitation of investments;
  • return on assets.

Added value

Value added (NA) is the difference between the cost of manufactured products and the cost of consumed raw materials, materials and services:

Value added \u003d cost of manufactured products - cost of consumed raw materials, materials and services.

In its own way economic essence value added represents that part of the value of the social product, which is newly created in the production process. Another part of the value of the social product is the cost of raw materials, materials, electricity, labor, etc. used.

Gross result of exploitation of investments

The Gross Result of Exploitation of Investments (BREI) is the difference between value added and labor costs (direct and indirect). Overspending tax may also be deducted from the gross result wages:

Gross result of exploitation of investments = value added - expenses (direct and indirect) for wages - tax on wage overruns.

The gross result of investment exploitation (BREI) is an intermediate indicator of the financial performance of an enterprise, namely, an indicator of the sufficiency of funds to cover the costs taken into account in its calculation.

Net result of exploitation of investments

The net operating result of an investment (NREI) is the difference between the gross operating result of an investment and the cost of restoring fixed assets. In its economic essence, the gross result of the exploitation of investments is nothing more than profit before interest and taxes.

In practice, the balance sheet profit is often taken as the net result of the operation of investments, which is wrong, since the balance sheet profit (profit transferred to the balance sheet) is profit after paying not only interest and taxes, but also dividends:

Net result of the operation of investments = gross result of the operation of investments - the cost of restoring fixed assets (depreciation).

Return on assets

Profitability is the ratio of the result to the funds spent. The return on assets (RA) is understood as the ratio of profit before interest and taxes to assets - the funds spent on the production of products:

Return on Assets = (net return on investment / assets) 100%

Transforming the formula for return on assets will allow you to obtain formulas for the profitability of sales and asset turnover. To do this, we use a simple mathematical rule: multiplying the numerator and denominator of a fraction by the same number will not change the value of the fraction. Multiply the numerator and denominator of the fraction (return on assets) by the volume of sales and divide the resulting figure into two fractions:

Return on assets = (net result of operation of investments sales volume / assets sales volume) 100% = (net result of operation of investments / sales volume) (sales volume / assets) 100%.

The resulting formula for return on assets as a whole is called the Dupont formula. The indicators included in this formula have their names and their meaning. The ratio of the net result of the operation of investments to the volume of sales is called the commercial margin. In essence, this coefficient is nothing but the coefficient of profitability of the implementation.

The indicator "sales volume / assets" is called the transformation ratio, in essence, this ratio is nothing more than the asset turnover ratio. Thus, the regulation of the return on assets is reduced to the regulation of the commercial margin (sales profitability) and the transformation ratio (asset turnover).

But back to financial leverage. Let us substitute the formulas for net profit per ordinary share in circulation and the net result of the operation of investments into the formula for the force of financial leverage:

The strength of the impact of financial leverage - percentage change in net income per ordinary share in circulation / percentage change in the net result of the operation of investments = (net profit - the amount of dividends on preferred shares / the number of ordinary shares in circulation) / (net result of the operation of investments / assets) 100%.

This formula makes it possible to estimate by what percentage the net profit per one ordinary share in circulation will change if the net result of investment operation changes by one percent.

Based on data tables 11 calculate the effect of financial leverage.

The effect of financial leverage (E fr) is an indicator that determines how much the percentage increases the return on equity (R sk) by attracting borrowed funds (LC) into the turnover of the enterprise. The effect of financial leverage occurs when the economic return on capital is higher than the interest on the loan.

E fr \u003d [R ik (1 - K n) - C pk]

E fk - the effect of financial leverage

R ik - return on invested capital before taxes (SP: SIK)

K n - taxation coefficient (Staxes:SP)

C pc - the interest rate on the loan provided for by the agreement

ZK - borrowed capital

SK - equity

Thus, the effect of financial leverage includes two components:

    The difference between the return on invested capital after tax and the rate for loans:

R ik (1 - K n) - S pk

    Financial Leverage:

Positive Efr occurs if R ik (1 - K n) - C pc > 0

If R IK (1 - K N) - C pc< 0, то создается отрицательный Э ФР (эффект «дубинки»), в результате чего происходит «проедание» собственного капитала и последствия могут быть резко негативными для предприятия. В этом случае рискованно увеличивать плечо финансового рычага, т.е. долю заемного капитала.

The effect of financial leverage depends on three factors:

a) the difference between the total return on invested capital after tax and the contractual interest rate:

R IK (1-K N) - C pk \u003d +, - ...%

b) reduction in the interest rate adjusted for tax benefits (tax savings):

C pc \u003d C pc (1 - K N) \u003d + ...%

c) financial leverage:

ZK: SK = ... %

Based on the results of factor analysis, draw a conclusion about the degree of influence of each factor; whether it is profitable for the enterprise in the current conditions to use borrowed funds in the turnover of the enterprise, whether as a result of this the return on equity increases. It should be borne in mind that by attracting borrowed funds, the enterprise can achieve its goals faster and on a larger scale, it takes an economically justified risk.

Liquidity analysis and solvency assessment.

The liquidity of an economic entity is its ability to quickly repay its debt. You can quickly determine the liquidity of an economic entity using the absolute liquidity ratio.

Solvency of the enterprise - the ability to cash resources in a timely manner to repay their payment obligations. Solvency analysis is necessary both for the enterprise (assessment and forecast of financial activity) and for external investors (banks), which, before issuing a loan, must verify the creditworthiness of the borrower. This also applies to those enterprises that want to enter into economic relations with each other.

Solvency assessment is carried out on the basis of the characteristics of the liquidity of current assets, which is determined by the time required to convert them into cash. The less time it takes to collect a given asset, the higher its liquidity.

Balance sheet liquidity is the ability of an enterprise to turn assets into cash and pay off its payment obligations (the degree to which the enterprise's debt obligations are covered by its assets, the period of conversion of which into cash corresponds to the maturity of payment obligations). The liquidity of the balance sheet depends on the extent to which the value of available means of payment corresponds to the value of short-term debt obligations. The solvency of the enterprise depends on the degree of liquidity of the balance sheet, while it may be solvent at the reporting date, but have unfavorable opportunities in the future.

Analysis of the liquidity of the balance sheet consists in comparing the assets of the asset (grouped by the degree of decreasing liquidity) with short-term liabilities of the liability (grouped by the degree of increasing maturity). Carry out the appropriate grouping in table 12.

Depending on the degree of liquidity, the assets of an economic entity are divided into the following groups:

A 1 - the most liquid assets

(cash and short-term financial investments);

A 2 - fast-selling assets

(accounts receivable, VAT, other current assets);

A 3 - slow-moving assets

(stocks, excluding future expenses; long-term financial investments);

A 4 - hard-to-sell assets

(intangible assets, fixed assets, construction in progress, other non-current assets, deferred expenses).

Liabilities of the balance are grouped according to the degree of urgency of their payment:

P 1 - the most urgent liabilities

(accounts payable);

P 2 - short-term liabilities

(without accounts payable, i.e. borrowed funds, dividend payments, deferred income, reserves for future expenses, other short-term liabilities);

P 3 - long-term liabilities

(long-term borrowings and other long-term liabilities);

P 4 - permanent liabilities

(capital and reserves)

The balance is considered absolutely liquid if the following conditions are met:

A 1 ³P 1 A 3³P 3

A 2 ³P 2 A 4 £ P 4

The liquidity of an economic entity can be quickly determined using the absolute liquidity ratio, which is the ratio of funds ready for payments and settlements to short-term liabilities. This coefficient characterizes the ability of an economic entity to mobilize funds to cover short-term debt. The higher this ratio, the more reliable the borrower.

Assessment of the balance sheet structure

and diagnostics of the risk of bankruptcy of the enterprise

As criteria for diagnosing the risk of bankruptcy, indicators of assessing the structure of the balance sheet are used. For the purpose of recognizing agricultural organizations as insolvent, the structure of the balance sheet for the last reporting period is analyzed ( table 13):

    Current liquidity ratio (K TL);

    The coefficient of security with own working capital (K OSS);

    The coefficient of restoration (loss) of solvency (K V (U) P).

The balance sheet structure is recognized as unsatisfactory, and the organization is insolvent, if one of the following conditions is present:

    To TL at the end of the reporting period has a value of less than 2.

    To OSOS at the end of the reporting period is less than 0.1.

According to the organization's balance sheet, the current liquidity ratio (K TL) is determined as the ratio of the actual value of those available to the enterprise (organization) working capital in the form of inventories, finished products, cash, receivables and other current assets (section II of the balance sheet asset) (TA) to the most urgent liabilities of the enterprise in the form of short-term bank loans, short-term loans and payables (TP):

K 1 \u003d Current Assets (without deferred expenses): Current Liabilities (without deferred income and reserves for future expenses and payments), where

TA - total for section II "Current assets";

TP - total for section V "Current liabilities"

The coefficient of provision with own working capital (K OSS) is determined by:

K 2 \u003d Availability of own sources (III P - I A): The amount of working capital (II A), where

III P p. 490 - total for section III "Capital and reserves";

I A p. 190 - total for section I "Non-current assets";

II A p. 290 - total for section II "Current assets";

In the event that the current liquidity ratio and the ratio of own working capital (at least one) are below the standard values, then the balance sheet structure is assessed as unsatisfactory and then the solvency recovery ratio is calculated for a period equal to 6 months.

In the event that both ratios meet or exceed the standard level: the current liquidity ratio ≥ 2 and the working capital ratio ≥ 0.1, then the balance sheet structure is assessed as satisfactory and then the solvency loss ratio is calculated for a period equal to 3 months.

The coefficient of recovery (loss) of solvency (K V (U) P) is determined taking into account the current liquidity ratios calculated according to the data at the beginning and at the end of the year:

KZ \u003d [K tl. end of the year + (U: T) (K tl. end of the year - K tl beginning of the year)] : K standard. , Where

To tl.end of the year - the actual value of the current liquidity ratio, calculated according to the balance sheet at the end of the year;

To tl the beginning of the year - the value of the current liquidity ratio, calculated according to the balance sheet at the beginning of the year;

To the standard. – normative value equal to 2;

T - reporting period equal to 12 months;

At solvency recovery period equal to 6 months. (loss of solvency - 3 months).

The coefficient of loss of solvency, which takes a value of less than 1, indicates that the organization will lose its solvency in the near future. If the solvency loss ratio is greater than 1, then there is no threat of bankruptcy in the next 3 months.

Conclusions about the recognition of the balance sheet structure as unsatisfactory, and the enterprise as insolvent, are made with a negative balance sheet structure and the absence of a real opportunity for it to restore its solvency.

In the process of subsequent analysis, ways to improve the structure of the balance sheet of the enterprise and its solvency should be studied.

First of all, you should study the dynamics of the balance sheet currency. The absolute decrease in the balance sheet indicates a reduction in the economic turnover of the enterprise, which is one of the reasons for its insolvency.

Establishing the fact of curtailment of economic activity requires a thorough analysis of its causes. Such reasons may be a reduction in effective demand for the products and services of this enterprise, limited access to raw materials markets, the gradual inclusion of subsidiaries in the active economic turnover at the expense of the parent company, etc.

Depending on the circumstances that caused the reduction in the economic turnover of the enterprise, various ways can be recommended to bring it out of a state of insolvency.

With an increase in the balance sheet for the reporting period, one should take into account the impact of the revaluation of funds, the rise in the cost of inventories, finished products. Without this, it is difficult to conclude whether the increase in the balance sheet is a consequence of the expansion of the economic activity of the enterprise or a consequence of inflationary processes.

If an enterprise expands its activities, then the reasons for its insolvency should be sought in the irrational use of profits, the diversion of funds into accounts receivable, the freezing of funds in excess production reserves, errors in determining pricing policy, etc.

Study of the structure of the balance sheet liability allows you to establish one of the possible reasons for the insolvency of the enterprise - too high a share of borrowed funds in the sources of financing of economic activity. The trend of increasing the share of borrowed funds, on the one hand, indicates an increase in the financial stability of the enterprise and an increase in the degree of its financial risk, and on the other hand, an active redistribution of income in the context of inflation in favor of the borrowing enterprise.

The assets of the enterprise and their structure are studied both in terms of their participation in production and in terms of their liquidity. A change in the structure of assets in favor of an increase in working capital indicates:

    on the formation of a more mobile structure of assets, contributing to the acceleration of the turnover of the company's funds;

    on the diversion of a part of current assets for lending to buyers, subsidiaries and other debtors, which indicates the actual immobilization of working capital from the production process;

    on the curtailment of the production base;

    on the delayed adjustment of the value of fixed assets in the face of inflation.

If there are long- and short-term financial investments, it is necessary to assess their effectiveness and liquidity of securities in the company's portfolio.

The absolute and relative growth of current assets may indicate not only the expansion of production or the impact of the inflation factor, but also a slowdown in capital turnover, which causes the need to increase its mass. Therefore, it is necessary to study the indicators of turnover of working capital in general and at individual stages of the cycle.

When studying the structure of inventories and costs, it is necessary to identify trends in changes in inventories, work in progress, finished products and goods.

An increase in the share of inventories may be the result of:

    increasing the production capacity of the enterprise;

    the desire to protect funds from depreciation in conditions of inflation;

    irrationally chosen economic strategy, as a result of which a significant part of working capital is frozen in stocks, the liquidity of which may be low.

When studying the structure of current assets, much attention is paid to the state of settlements with debtors. The high growth rates of receivables indicate that this company is actively using the strategy of commodity loans for consumers of its products. By lending to them, the company actually shares with them part of its income. At the same time, if payments for products are delayed, the company is forced to take out loans to support its activities, increasing its own financial obligations to creditors. Therefore, the main task of a retrospective analysis of accounts receivable is to assess its liquidity, i.e. repayment of debts to the enterprise, for which it is necessary to decipher it with information about each debtor, the amount of debt, the prescription of formation and the expected repayment periods. It is also necessary to estimate the rate of capital turnover in receivables and cash, comparing it with the rate of inflation.

A necessary element of the analysis of the financial condition of insolvent enterprises is the study of financial performance and the use of profits. If the enterprise is unprofitable, then this indicates the absence of a source of replenishment of own funds and the “eating away” of capital. The ratio of the amount of own capital to the amount of losses of the enterprise shows the speed of its "eating up".

In the event that the company makes a profit and is at the same time insolvent, it is necessary to analyze the use of profits. It is also necessary to study the possibilities of the enterprise to increase the amount of profit by increasing the volume of production and sales of products, reducing its cost, improving quality and competitiveness. Great help in identifying these reserves and can provide an analysis of the performance of enterprises - competitors.

One of the reasons for the insolvency of economic objects is the high level of taxation, therefore, in the analysis, it is advisable to calculate the tax burden of the enterprise.

A decrease in the amount of equity capital can also occur due to the negative effect of financial leverage, when the profit received from the use of borrowed funds is less than the amount of financial costs of debt servicing.

Based on the results of the analysis, specific measures should be taken to improve the structure of the balance sheet and the financial condition of insolvent business entities.

When comparing 2 enterprises with the same level of economic profitability (Profit from sales / all Assets), the difference in m / d between them may be that one of them does not have loans, while the other actively attracts borrowed funds (NP / SK). That. the difference lies in the different level of return on equity, obtained through a different structure of financial sources. The difference m / d two levels of profitability is the level of the effect of financial leverage. EGF there is an increment to the net profitability of own funds, obtained as a result of the use of the loan, despite its payment.

EFR \u003d (1-T) * (ER - St%) * ZK / SK, where T is the income tax rate (in shares), ER-ek. profitability (%), St% - the average interest rate on the loan,

ER = Sales Profit/All Assets. ER characterizes the investment attractiveness of the enterprise. Har-et efficient use of all capital, despite the fact that you still need to pay% for the loan.

The first component of the EGF is called differential and characterizes the difference between the economic return on assets and the average calculated interest rate on borrowed funds (ER - SIRT).

The second component - the leverage of the financial leverage (financial activity ratio) - reflects the ratio between borrowed and own funds (LC / SK). The larger it is, the greater the financial risks.

The effect of financial leverage allows:

Justify financial risks and evaluate financial risks.

Rules arising from the EGF formula:

If the new borrowing brings an increase in the level of EGF, then it is beneficial for the organization. It is recommended to carefully monitor the state of the differential: when increasing the leverage of financial leverage, the bank tends to compensate for the increase in its own risk by increasing the price of the loan

The larger the differential (d), the lower the risk (respectively, the smaller d, the greater the risk). In this case, the creditor's risk is expressed by the value of the differential. If d>0, you can borrow if d<0, то высокие риск - не рекомендуется занимать, эффект от использования ЗК меньше суммы % за кредит; если d=0, то весь эффект от использования ЗК пойдет на уплату % за кредит.

EGF is an important concept that, under certain conditions, allows you to assess the impact of debt on the profitability of the organization. Financial leverage is typical for situations where the structure of sources of capital formation contains obligations with a fixed interest rate. In this case, an effect similar to the use of operating leverage is created, that is, profit after interest rises / falls at a faster rate than changes in output.


Finnish advantage. lever: capital borrowed by an organization at a fixed interest rate can be used in the course of business in such a way that it will bring a higher profit than the interest paid. The difference accumulates as the profit of the organization.

The effect of operating leverage affects the result before finance costs and taxes. An EGF occurs when an organization is indebted or has a source of funding that entails the payment of fixed amounts. It affects net income and thus the return on equity. EGF increases the impact of annual turnover on the return on equity.

Total leverage effect = Operating leverage effect * Financial leverage effect.

With a high value of both levers, any small increase in the annual turnover of an organization will significantly affect the value of its return on equity.

The effect of operating leverage is the presence of a relationship between the change in sales proceeds and the change in profit. The strength of operating leverage is calculated as the quotient of sales revenue after recovering variable costs to earnings. Operating leverage generates entrepreneurial risk.

Economic analysis Litvinyuk Anna Sergeevna

30. Leverage (financial leverage). The effect of financial leverage

Financial leverage (“financial leverage”) is a financial mechanism for managing the return on equity by optimizing the ratio of used own and borrowed funds. Thus, financial leverage allows you to influence profit through optimization of the capital structure.

The effect of financial leverage is an indicator that reflects the increase in the return on equity obtained through the use of a loan, despite the payment of the latter. It is calculated using the following formula:

EFL \u003d (1? NP)? (R A?% Av.) ZK / SK,

where EFL is the effect of financial leverage, which consists in the increase in the return on equity ratio,%; PN - income tax rate, expressed as a decimal fraction; R A - gross profit margin of assets (the ratio of gross profit to the average value of assets),%; % cf.- the average amount of interest on a loan paid by the enterprise for the use of borrowed capital,%; 3K - the average amount of borrowed capital used by the enterprise; SC - the average amount of equity capital of the enterprise.

The above formula for calculating the effect of financial leverage allows us to distinguish three main components in it:

1. Financial leverage tax corrector (1-TP), which shows the extent to which the effect of financial leverage is manifested due to different levels of taxation of profits.

2. Financial leverage differential (РА?%av.) which reflects the difference between the gross return on assets and the average interest rate for a loan.

3. Leverage of the financial leverage of SC/SC, which characterizes the amount of borrowed capital used by the enterprise, per unit of equity.

The tax corrector of financial leverage practically does not depend on the activity of the enterprise, since the income tax rate is established by law. In the process of managing financial leverage, the differential tax corrector can be used in the following cases:

Differentiation of the profit tax rate or the availability of tax incentives for various types of enterprise activities;

Carrying out activities of subsidiaries of the enterprise in offshore zones or countries with a different tax climate. Financial leverage differential is the main

a condition that generates a positive effect of financial leverage, if the level of gross profit generated by the assets of the enterprise exceeds the average interest rate for the loan used. The higher the positive value of the financial leverage differential, the higher, other things being equal, its effect will be.

The financial leverage leverage is the leverage that causes the positive or negative effect obtained through the differential. With a positive value of the differential, any increase in the financial leverage ratio will cause an even greater increase in the return on equity ratio, and with a negative value of the differential, an increase in the financial leverage ratio will lead to an even greater rate of decline in the return on equity ratio. Thus, with the differential unchanged, the financial leverage leverage is the main generator of both the increase in the amount and level of return on equity, and the financial risk of losing this profit. Similarly, with the leverage of financial leverage unchanged, the positive or negative dynamics of its differential generates both an increase in the amount and level of return on equity, and the financial risk of its loss.

Knowledge of the mechanism of the impact of financial capital on the level of profitability of equity and the level of financial risk allows you to purposefully manage both the value and the capital structure of the enterprise.

The quantitative value of the influence of factors on the change in the resulting indicator is found by applying one of the special methods of economic analysis.

From the book Finance and Credit author Shevchuk Denis Alexandrovich

31. The role of loans to legal entities and individuals. Borrowed funds as financial leverage Any legal entity or individual may act as a lender under a regular loan agreement.Financial leverage; GearingFinancial leverage - cumulative impact on level

From the book Microeconomics author Vechkanova Galina Rostislavovna

Question 10 Consumer reaction to price change. The substitution effect and the income effect. A CHANGE in the price of one good, with fixed income and constant prices for other goods, causes the budget line to shift to a point more distant or closer to the beginning

From the book Cashing In on the Crisis of Capitalism ... or Where to Invest Money Right author Khotimsky Dmitry

From the book Down with Productivity! 9 steps to work less and get more done author Robbins Stever

Leverage Imagine that you are a Formula 1 racer. On a straight line, you need to gain maximum speed, and brake before turning. You can not go too fast - do not fit into the turn. You can't go too slow - everyone will overtake you. Now imagine that you are not

From the book Investing in real estate author Kiyosaki Robert Toru

Step 9 Use the Lever Effect The ninth and final step ties together everything we've learned so far and enhances the effectiveness of each of the previous steps. Yes, it's a leverage effect. Leverage is the Big Mom of the “work less, do more” principle. Big Mama doesn't

From the book Millionaire in a Minute. Direct path to wealth author Hansen Mark Victor

Automate for leverage Once upon a time, most of humanity spent a lot of time picking cotton, spinning thread, creating fabrics and tailoring to look spectacular and attract the attention of the objects of their dreams. Automation has changed everything.

From the book Comprehensive Economic Analysis of the Enterprise. Short Course author Team of authors

Financial Leverage Leverage is achieved when you invest as little of your money as possible while acquiring as much property as possible. In other words, the less equity capital is invested, the higher the return on equity. Analyzing real estate

From the book How to make millions on ideas author Kennedy Dan

The Leverage Effect “In order to get things done,” Samantha continued, “we need to find a million dollar idea and then leverage it. The lever allows you to not only lift heavy objects with minimal effort. It also provides speed. - And what serves us

From the book Unfair Advantage. The Power of Financial Education author Kiyosaki Robert Toru

Lever effect = speed Lever effect equals speed. If you want to get rich, you can't do without leverage, and significant power. The "lever mechanism" of enrichment consists of three parts. The first part is your goal (dream) that you want to realize.

From the book Sales Management author Petrov Konstantin Nikolaevich

Dream Teams and the Lever Effect Success is not a single project; it must be general. And you don't have to compete for success. There is enough for everyone around. You should work with a team whose members share a common dream or goal. The team is part of your leverage. It allows you to succeed

From the author's book

Networks and the Leverage Effect Since there are always two people connecting, the value of the connection increases twice as fast as the investment of each individual. KEVIN KELLY. NEW RULES FOR THE NEW ECONOMY Your network of connections increases your leverage. The wider your connections, the more

From the author's book

Endless Web and Leverage Effect You can be sure that if you dedicate your time and attention to serving others, the Universe will support you, and always right on time. R. BUCKMINSTER FULLER Enlightened Millionaires Realize There's Spirituality in Wealth

From the author's book

10.6. Interrelation of indicators of economic and financial profitability. the effect of financial leverage Earlier, we determined that economic profitability is the profitability of the organization's assets; financial return is the return on equity

From the author's book

The Secret to Incredible Financial Leverage: Commissioned Publishing I first tried "printing my own money" in 1978. Shortly after I began to speak as a professional lecturer and joined the association, I found that having

From the author's book

The Third Law of Compensation. Genuine financial education grows with the law of compound interest and has tremendous leverage. The more you improve your education in the B and I quadrants, the more you earn. Your knowledge and income grow by

From the author's book

Financial Leverage The third lever of influence on ROE is financial. The company improves this ratio by increasing the ratio of debt to equity to finance the business. Unlike return on sales and asset turnover ratio,

The coefficient of financial leverage (financial leverage) gives an idea of ​​the real ratio of own and borrowed funds in the enterprise. Based on the data on the financial leverage ratio, one can judge the stability of the economic entity, the level of its profitability.

What does financial leverage mean

The financial leverage ratio is often called financial leverage, which is able to influence the level of profit of the organization by changing the ratio of own and borrowed funds. It is used in the process of analyzing the subject of economic relations to determine the level of its financial stability in the long term.

The values ​​of the financial leverage ratio help the company's analysts to identify additional potential for profitability growth, assess the degree of possible risks and determine the dependence of the level of profit on external and internal factors. With the help of financial leverage, it is possible to influence the organization's net profit by managing financial liabilities, and there is also a clear idea of ​​the appropriateness of using credit funds.

Types of financial leverage

According to the efficiency of use, there are several types of financial leverage:

  1. Positive. It is formed when the benefit from raising borrowed funds exceeds the fee (interest) for using the loan.
  2. Negative. It is typical for a situation where the assets acquired by obtaining a loan do not pay off, and the profit is either absent or below the listed percentages.
  3. Neutral. Financial leverage, in which the income from investments is equivalent to the costs of obtaining borrowed funds.

Financial Leverage Formulas

The financial leverage ratio is the ratio of debt to equity. The calculation formula is as follows:

FL = ZK / SK,

where: FL is the financial leverage ratio;

ZK - borrowed capital (long-term and short-term);

SC is equity capital.

This formula also reflects the financial risks of the enterprise. The optimal value of the coefficient ranges from 0.5-0.8. With such indicators, it is possible to maximize profits with minimal risks.

For some organizations (trading, banking), a higher value is acceptable, provided that they have a guaranteed cash flow.

Most often, when determining the level of the coefficient value, they use not the book (accounting) cost of equity, but the market value. The indicators obtained in this case will most accurately reflect the current situation.

A more detailed version of the financial leverage ratio formula is as follows:

FL \u003d (GK / SA) / (IK / SA) / (OA / IK) / (OK / OA) × (OK / SK),

where: ZK is borrowed capital;

SA is the sum of assets;

IC is invested capital;

ОА is current assets;

OK is working capital;

SC is equity capital.

The ratio of indicators presented in brackets has the following characteristics:

  • (ZK / SA) is the coefficient of financial dependence. The lower the ratio of borrowed capital to total assets, the more stable the company financially.
  • (IC / SA) is a coefficient that determines the financial independence of a long-term nature. The higher the score, the more stable the organization.
  • (OA / IC) is the coefficient of maneuverability of the IC. Preferably, its lower value, which determines financial stability.
  • (OK / ОА) is the coefficient of provision with working capital. High rates characterize the greater reliability of the company.
  • (OK / SC) is the SC maneuverability coefficient. Financial stability increases with decreasing coefficient.

Example 1

The company at the beginning of the year has the following indicators:

  • ZK - 101 million rubles;
  • SA - 265 million rubles;
  • OK - 199 million rubles;
  • OA - 215 million rubles;
  • SK - 115 million rubles;
  • IC - 118 million rubles.

Calculate the financial leverage ratio:

FL = (101 / 265) / (118 / 265) / (215 / 118) / (199 / 215) × (199 / 115) = 0.878.

Or FL \u003d ZK / SK \u003d 101 / 115 \u003d 0.878.

The conditions characterizing the profitability of IC (equity capital) are greatly influenced by the amount of borrowed funds. The value of the profitability of the equity capital (equity) is determined by the formula:

RSK = CHP / SK,

NP is net profit;

For a detailed analysis of the financial leverage ratio and the reasons for its changes, all 5 indicators included in the considered formula for its calculation should be considered. As a result, the sources will be clear due to which the indicator of financial leverage has increased or decreased.

The effect of financial leverage

Comparison of indicators of the financial leverage ratio and profitability as a result of the use of SC (own capital) is called the effect of financial leverage. As a result, you can get an idea of ​​how the profitability of the insurance company depends on the level of borrowed funds. The difference between the cost of return on assets and the level of receipt of funds from the outside (that is, borrowed) is determined.

  • IA is gross income or profit before tax and interest;
  • PSP - profit before taxes, reduced by the amount of interest on loans.

The PD indicator is calculated as follows:

VD \u003d C × O - I × O - PR,

where: C is the average price of manufactured products;

O is the output volume;

And - costs based on 1 unit of goods;

PR is fixed costs of production.

The effect of financial leverage (EFL) is considered as the ratio of profit indicators before and after interest payments, that is:

EFL \u003d VD / PSP.

In more detail, EFL is calculated based on the following values:

EFL \u003d (RA - CZK) × (1 - SNP / 100) × ZK / SK,

where: RA - return on assets (measured as a percentage excluding taxes and interest on the loan payable);

CPC is the cost of borrowed funds, expressed as a percentage;

SNP is the current income tax rate;

ZK is borrowed capital;

SC is equity capital.

Return on assets (RA) as a percentage, in turn, is equal to:

RA = IA / (SC + SC) × 100%.

Example 2

Calculate the effect of financial leverage using the following data:

  • IA \u003d 202 million rubles;
  • SC = 122 million rubles;
  • ZK = 94 million rubles;
  • CZK = 14%;
  • SNP = 20%.

Using the formula EFL \u003d EFL \u003d (RA - CZK)× (1 - SNP / 100)× ZK / SK, we get the following result:

EFL = (202 / (122 + 94)× 100) - 14,00)% × (1 - 20 / 100) × 94 / 122= (93,52% - 14,00%) × (1 - 0,2) × 94 / 122 =79,52% × 0,8 × 94 / 122 = 49,01%.

Example 3

If, under the same conditions, there is an increase in borrowed funds by 20% (up to 112.8 million rubles), then the EFL indicator will be equal to:

EFL = (202 / (122 + 112.8)× 100 - 14,00)% × (1 - 20 / 100) × 112,8 / 122 = (86,03% - 14,00%) × 0,8 × 112,8 / 122 = 72,03% × 0,8 × 112,8 / 122 = 53,28%.

Thus, by increasing the level of borrowed funds, it is possible to achieve a higher EFL, that is, to increase the return on equity by attracting borrowed funds. At the same time, each company conducts its own assessment of financial risks associated with difficulties in repaying credit obligations.

The factors characterizing the return on equity are also affected by the factors of attracting borrowed funds. The formula for determining the return on equity will be:

RSK = CHP / SK,

where: RSK - return on equity;

NP is net profit;

SC is the amount of own capital.

Example 4

The balance sheet profit of the organization amounted to 18 million rubles. The current income tax rate is 20%, the size of the equity capital is 22 million rubles, the credit card (attracted) is 15 million rubles, the amount of interest on the loan is 14% (2.1 million rubles). What is the profitability of the IC with and without borrowed funds?

Solution 1 . Net profit (NP) is equal to the sum of balance sheet profit minus the cost of borrowed funds (interest equal to 2.1 million rubles) and income tax from the remaining amount: (18 - 2.1)× 20% = 3.18 million rubles.

PE \u003d 18 - 2.1 - 3.18 \u003d 12.72 million rubles.

The profitability of the IC in this case will have the following value: 12.72 / 22× 100% = 57,8%.

Solution 2 The same indicator without attracting funds from outside will be equal to 14.4 / 22 = 65.5%, where:

NP = 18 - (18× 0.2) = 14.4 million rubles.

Results

Analyzing the data of indicators of the financial leverage ratio and the effect of financial leverage, it is possible to manage the enterprise more efficiently, based on attracting a sufficient amount of borrowed funds, without going beyond conditional financial risks. The formulas and examples given in our article will help you calculate the indicators.