Let's work with quadratic equations. These are very popular equations! In the very general view the quadratic equation looks like this:

For example:

Here A =1; b = 3; c = -4

Here A =2; b = -0,5; c = 2,2

Here A =-3; b = 6; c = -18

Well, you understand...

How to solve quadratic equations? If you have a quadratic equation in front of you in this form, then everything is simple. Let's remember Magic word discriminant . Rarely a high school student has not heard this word! The phrase “we solve through a discriminant” inspires confidence and reassurance. Because there is no need to expect tricks from the discriminant! It is simple and trouble-free to use. So, the formula for finding the roots of a quadratic equation looks like this:

The expression under the sign of the root is the one discriminant. As you can see, to find X, we use only a, b and c. Those. coefficients from a quadratic equation. Just carefully substitute the values a, b and c This is the formula we calculate. Let's substitute with your own signs! For example, for the first equation A =1; b = 3; c= -4. Here we write it down:

The example is almost solved:

That's all.

What cases are possible when using this formula? There are only three cases.

1. The discriminant is positive. This means the root can be extracted from it. Whether the root is extracted well or poorly is another question. What is important is what is extracted in principle. Then your quadratic equation has two roots. Two different solutions.

2. The discriminant is zero. Then you have one solution. Strictly speaking, this is not one root, but two identical. But this plays a role in inequalities, where we will study the issue in more detail.

3. The discriminant is negative. From a negative number Square root not extracted. Well, okay. This means there are no solutions.

Everything is very simple. And what, you think it’s impossible to make a mistake? Well, yes, how...
The most common mistakes are confusion with sign values a, b and c. Or rather, not with their signs (where to get confused?), but with the substitution of negative values ​​into the formula for calculating the roots. What helps here is a detailed recording of the formula with specific numbers. If there are problems with calculations, do that!

Suppose we need to solve the following example:

Here a = -6; b = -5; c = -1

Let's say you know that you rarely get answers the first time.

Well, don't be lazy. It will take about 30 seconds to write an extra line. And the number of errors will decrease sharply. So we write in detail, with all the brackets and signs:

It seems incredibly difficult to write out so carefully. But it only seems so. Give it a try. Well, or choose. What's better, fast or right? Besides, I will make you happy. After a while, there will be no need to write everything down so carefully. It will work out right on its own. Especially if you use practical techniques that are described below. This evil example with a bunch of minuses can be solved easily and without errors!

So, how to solve quadratic equations through the discriminant we remembered. Or they learned, which is also good. You know how to correctly determine a, b and c. Do you know how? attentively substitute them into the root formula and attentively count the result. Did you understand that keyword Here - attentively?

However, quadratic equations often look slightly different. For example, like this:

This incomplete quadratic equations . They can also be solved through a discriminant. You just need to understand correctly what they are equal to here. a, b and c.

Have you figured it out? In the first example a = 1; b = -4; A c? It's not there at all! Well yes, that's right. In mathematics this means that c = 0 ! That's all. Substitute zero into the formula instead c, and we will succeed. Same with the second example. Only we don’t have zero here With, A b !

But incomplete quadratic equations can be solved much more simply. Without any discrimination. Let's consider the first incomplete equation. What can you do on the left side? You can take X out of brackets! Let's take it out.

And what from this? And the fact that the product equals zero if and only if any of the factors equals zero! Don't believe me? Okay, then come up with two non-zero numbers that, when multiplied, will give zero!
Does not work? That's it...
Therefore, we can confidently write: x = 0, or x = 4

All. These will be the roots of our equation. Both are suitable. When substituting any of them into the original equation, we get the correct identity 0 = 0. As you can see, the solution is much simpler than using a discriminant.

The second equation can also be solved simply. Move 9 to right side. We get:

All that remains is to extract the root from 9, and that’s it. It will turn out:

Also two roots . x = +3 and x = -3.

This is how all incomplete quadratic equations are solved. Either by placing X out of brackets, or by simply moving the number to the right and then extracting the root.
It is extremely difficult to confuse these techniques. Simply because in the first case you will have to extract the root of X, which is somehow incomprehensible, and in the second case there is nothing to take out of brackets...

Now take note of practical techniques that dramatically reduce the number of errors. The same ones that are due to inattention... For which it later becomes painful and offensive...

First appointment. Don’t be lazy before solving a quadratic equation and bring it to standard form. What does this mean?
Let's say that after all the transformations you get the following equation:

Don't rush to write the root formula! You'll almost certainly get the odds mixed up a, b and c. Construct the example correctly. First, X squared, then without square, then the free term. Like this:

And again, don’t rush! A minus in front of an X squared can really upset you. It's easy to forget... Get rid of the minus. How? Yes, as taught in the previous topic! We need to multiply the entire equation by -1. We get:

But now you can safely write down the formula for the roots, calculate the discriminant and finish solving the example. Decide for yourself. You should now have roots 2 and -1.

Reception second. Check the roots! According to Vieta's theorem. Don't be scared, I'll explain everything! Checking last thing the equation. Those. the one we used to write down the root formula. If (as in this example) the coefficient a = 1, checking the roots is easy. It is enough to multiply them. The result should be a free member, i.e. in our case -2. Please note, not 2, but -2! Free member with your sign . If it doesn’t work out, it means they’ve already screwed up somewhere. Look for the error. If it works, you need to add the roots. Last and final check. The coefficient should be b With opposite familiar. In our case -1+2 = +1. A coefficient b, which is before the X, is equal to -1. So, everything is correct!
It’s a pity that this is so simple only for examples where x squared is pure, with a coefficient a = 1. But at least check in such equations! There will be fewer and fewer errors.

Reception third. If your equation has fractional coefficients, get rid of the fractions! Multiply the equation by a common denominator as described in the previous section. When working with fractions, errors keep creeping in for some reason...

By the way, I promised to simplify the evil example with a bunch of minuses. Please! Here he is.

In order not to get confused by the minuses, we multiply the equation by -1. We get:

That's all! Solving is a pleasure!

So, let's summarize the topic.

Practical advice:

1. Before solving, we bring the quadratic equation to standard form and build it Right.

2. If there is a negative coefficient in front of the X squared, we eliminate it by multiplying the entire equation by -1.

3. If the coefficients are fractional, we eliminate the fractions by multiplying the entire equation by the corresponding factor.

4. If x squared is pure, its coefficient is equal to one, the solution can be easily verified using Vieta’s theorem. Do it!

Fractional equations. ODZ.

We continue to master the equations. We already know how to work with linear and quadratic equations. The last view left - fractional equations. Or they are also called much more respectably - fractional rational equations. It is the same.

Fractional equations.

As the name implies, these equations necessarily contain fractions. But not just fractions, but fractions that have unknown in denominator. At least in one. For example:

Let me remind you that if the denominators are only numbers, these are linear equations.

How to decide fractional equations? First of all, get rid of fractions! After this, the equation most often turns into linear or quadratic. And then we know what to do... In some cases it can turn into an identity, such as 5=5 or an incorrect expression, such as 7=2. But this rarely happens. I will mention this below.

But how to get rid of fractions!? Very simple. Applying the same identical transformations.

We need to multiply the entire equation by the same expression. So that all denominators are reduced! Everything will immediately become easier. Let me explain with an example. Let us need to solve the equation:

How were you taught in elementary school? We move everything to one side, bring it to a common denominator, etc. Forget how horrible dream! This is what you need to do when you add or subtract. fractional expressions. Or you work with inequalities. And in equations, we immediately multiply both sides by an expression that will give us the opportunity to reduce all the denominators (i.e., in essence, by a common denominator). And what is this expression?

On the left side, reducing the denominator requires multiplying by x+2. And on the right, multiplication by 2 is required. This means that the equation must be multiplied by 2(x+2). Multiply:

This is a common multiplication of fractions, but I’ll describe it in detail:

Please note that I am not opening the bracket yet (x + 2)! So, in its entirety, I write it:

On the left side it contracts entirely (x+2), and on the right 2. Which is what was required! After reduction we get linear the equation:

And everyone can solve this equation! x = 2.

Let's solve another example, a little more complicated:

If we remember that 3 = 3/1, and 2x = 2x/ 1, we can write:

And again we get rid of what we don’t really like - fractions.

We see that to reduce the denominator with X, we need to multiply the fraction by (x – 2). And a few are not a hindrance to us. Well, let's multiply. All left side And all right side:

Parentheses again (x – 2) I'm not revealing. I work with the bracket as a whole as if it were one number! This must always be done, otherwise nothing will be reduced.

With a feeling of deep satisfaction we reduce (x – 2) and we get an equation without any fractions, with a ruler!

Now let’s open the brackets:

We bring similar ones, move everything to the left side and get:

Classic quadratic equation. But the minus ahead is not good. You can always get rid of it by multiplying or dividing by -1. But if you look closely at the example, you will notice that it is best to divide this equation by -2! In one fell swoop, the minus will disappear, and the odds will become more attractive! Divide by -2. On the left side - term by term, and on the right - simply divide zero by -2, zero and we get:

We solve through the discriminant and check using Vieta’s theorem. We get x = 1 and x = 3. Two roots.

As you can see, in the first case the equation after the transformation became linear, but here it becomes quadratic. It happens that after getting rid of fractions, all the X's are reduced. Something remains, like 5=5. It means that x can be anything. Whatever it is, it will still be reduced. And it will work out pure truth, 5=5. But, after getting rid of fractions, it may turn out to be completely untrue, like 2=7. And this means that no solutions! Any X turns out to be untrue.

Realized main way solutions fractional equations ? It is simple and logical. We change the original expression so that everything we don’t like disappears. Or it interferes. In this case these are fractions. We will do the same with all kinds of complex examples with logarithms, sines and other horrors. We Always Let's get rid of all this.

However, we need to change the original expression in the direction we need according to the rules, yes... The mastery of which is preparation for the Unified State Exam in mathematics. So we are mastering it.

Now we will learn how to bypass one of main ambushes on the Unified State Exam! But first, let's see whether you fall into it or not?

Let's look at a simple example:

The matter is already familiar, we multiply both sides by (x – 2), we get:

I remind you, with brackets (x – 2) We work as if with one, integral expression!

Here I no longer wrote one in the denominators, it’s undignified... And I didn’t draw brackets in the denominators, except for x – 2 there is nothing, you don’t have to draw. Let's shorten:

Open the parentheses, move everything to the left, and give similar ones:

We solve, check, we get two roots. x = 2 And x = 3. Great.

Suppose the assignment says to write down the root, or their sum if there is more than one root. What are we going to write?

If you decide the answer is 5, you were ambushed. And the task will not be credited to you. They worked in vain... Correct answer is 3.

What's the matter?! And you try to do a check. Substitute the values ​​of the unknown into original example. And if at x = 3 everything will grow together wonderfully, we get 9 = 9, then when x = 2 It will be division by zero! What you absolutely cannot do. Means x = 2 is not a solution, and is not taken into account in the answer. This is the so-called extraneous or extra root. We simply discard it. The final root is one. x = 3.

How so?! – I hear indignant exclamations. We were taught that an equation can be multiplied by an expression! This identity transformation!

Yes, identical. Under a small condition - the expression by which we multiply (divide) - different from zero. A x – 2 at x = 2 equals zero! So everything is fair.

And now what i can do?! Don't multiply by expression? Should I check every time? Again it’s unclear!

Calmly! Don't panic!

In this difficult situation, three magic letters will save us. I know what you're thinking. Right! This ODZ . Area of ​​Acceptable Values.

Formulas for the roots of a quadratic equation. The cases of real, multiple and complex roots are considered. Factoring a quadratic trinomial. Geometric interpretation. Examples of determining roots and factoring.

Basic formulas

Consider the quadratic equation:
(1) .
Roots of a quadratic equation(1) are determined by the formulas:
; .
These formulas can be combined like this:
.
When the roots of a quadratic equation are known, then a polynomial of the second degree can be represented as a product of factors (factored):
.

Next we assume that are real numbers.
Let's consider discriminant of a quadratic equation:
.
If the discriminant is positive, then the quadratic equation (1) has two different real roots:
; .
Then the factorization of the quadratic trinomial has the form:
.
If the discriminant is equal to zero, then the quadratic equation (1) has two multiple (equal) real roots:
.
Factorization:
.
If the discriminant is negative, then the quadratic equation (1) has two complex conjugate roots:
;
.
Here is the imaginary unit, ;
and are the real and imaginary parts of the roots:
; .
Then

.

Graphic interpretation

If you build graph of a function
,
which is a parabola, then the points of intersection of the graph with the axis will be the roots of the equation
.
At , the graph intersects the x-axis (axis) at two points.
When , the graph touches the x-axis at one point.
When , the graph does not cross the x-axis.

Below are examples of such graphs.

Useful formulas related to quadratic equation

(f.1) ;
(f.2) ;
(f.3) .

Derivation of the formula for the roots of a quadratic equation

We carry out transformations and apply formulas (f.1) and (f.3):




,
Where
; .

So, we got the formula for a polynomial of the second degree in the form:
.
This shows that the equation

performed at
And .
That is, and are the roots of the quadratic equation
.

Examples of determining the roots of a quadratic equation

Example 1

(1.1) .

Solution

.
Comparing with our equation (1.1), we find the values ​​of the coefficients:
.
We find the discriminant:
.
Since the discriminant is positive, the equation has two real roots:
;
;
.

From here we obtain the factorization of the quadratic trinomial:

.

Graph of the function y = 2 x 2 + 7 x + 3 intersects the x-axis at two points.

Let's plot the function
.
The graph of this function is a parabola. It crosses the abscissa axis (axis) at two points:
And .
These points are the roots of the original equation (1.1).

Answer

;
;
.

Example 2

Find the roots of a quadratic equation:
(2.1) .

Solution

Let's write the quadratic equation in general form:
.
Comparing with the original equation (2.1), we find the values ​​of the coefficients:
.
We find the discriminant:
.
Since the discriminant is zero, the equation has two multiple (equal) roots:
;
.

Then the factorization of the trinomial has the form:
.

Graph of the function y = x 2 - 4 x + 4 touches the x-axis at one point.

Let's plot the function
.
The graph of this function is a parabola. It touches the x-axis (axis) at one point:
.
This point is the root of the original equation (2.1). Because this root is factored twice:
,
then such a root is usually called a multiple. That is, they believe that there are two equal roots:
.

Answer

;
.

Example 3

Find the roots of a quadratic equation:
(3.1) .

Solution

Let's write the quadratic equation in general form:
(1) .
Let's rewrite the original equation (3.1):
.
Comparing with (1), we find the values ​​of the coefficients:
.
We find the discriminant:
.
The discriminant is negative, . Therefore there are no real roots.

You can find complex roots:
;
;
.

Then


.

The graph of the function does not cross the x-axis. There are no real roots.

Let's plot the function
.
The graph of this function is a parabola. It does not intersect the x-axis (axis). Therefore there are no real roots.

Answer

There are no real roots. Complex roots:
;
;
.

The use of equations is widespread in our lives. They are used in many calculations, construction of structures and even sports. Man used equations in ancient times, and since then their use has only increased. The discriminant allows you to solve any quadratic equation using general formula, which looks like this:

The discriminant formula depends on the degree of the polynomial. The above formula is suitable for solving quadratic equations of the following form:

The discriminant has the following properties that you need to know:

* "D" is 0 when the polynomial has multiple roots (equal roots);

* "D" is a symmetric polynomial with respect to the roots of the polynomial and is therefore a polynomial in its coefficients; moreover, the coefficients of this polynomial are integers regardless of the extension in which the roots are taken.

Let's say we are given a quadratic equation of the following form:

1 equation

According to the formula we have:

Since \, the equation has 2 roots. Let's define them:

Where can I solve an equation using a discriminant online solver?

You can solve the equation on our website https://site. The free online solver will allow you to solve online equations of any complexity in a matter of seconds. All you need to do is simply enter your data into the solver. You can also watch the video instructions and find out how to solve the equation on our website. And if you have any questions, you can ask them in our VKontakte group http://vk.com/pocketteacher. Join our group, we are always happy to help you.

Quadratic equation problems are studied both in the school curriculum and in universities. They mean equations of the form a*x^2 + b*x + c = 0, where x- variable, a, b, c – constants; a<>0 . The task is to find the roots of the equation.

Geometric meaning of quadratic equation

The graph of a function that is represented by a quadratic equation is a parabola. The solutions (roots) of a quadratic equation are the points of intersection of the parabola with the abscissa (x) axis. It follows that there are three possible cases:
1) the parabola has no points of intersection with the abscissa axis. This means that it is in the upper plane with branches up or the bottom with branches down. In such cases, the quadratic equation has no real roots (it has two complex roots).

2) the parabola has one point of intersection with the Ox axis. Such a point is called the vertex of the parabola, and the quadratic equation at it acquires its minimum or maximum value. In this case, the quadratic equation has one real root (or two identical roots).

3) The last case is more interesting in practice - there are two points of intersection of the parabola with the abscissa axis. This means that there are two real roots of the equation.

Based on the analysis of the coefficients of the powers of the variables, interesting conclusions can be drawn about the placement of the parabola.

1) If the coefficient a is greater than zero, then the parabola’s branches are directed upward; if it is negative, the parabola’s branches are directed downward.

2) If the coefficient b is greater than zero, then the vertex of the parabola lies in the left half-plane if it takes negative meaning- then on the right.

Derivation of the formula for solving a quadratic equation

Let's transfer the constant from the quadratic equation

for the equal sign, we get the expression

Multiply both sides by 4a

To get a complete square on the left, add b^2 on both sides and carry out the transformation

From here we find

Formula for the discriminant and roots of a quadratic equation

The discriminant is the value of the radical expression. If it is positive, then the equation has two real roots, calculated by the formula When the discriminant is zero, the quadratic equation has one solution (two coinciding roots), which can be easily obtained from the above formula for D=0. When the discriminant is negative, the equation has no real roots. However, solutions to the quadratic equation are found in the complex plane, and their value is calculated using the formula

Vieta's theorem

Let's consider two roots of a quadratic equation and construct a quadratic equation on their basis. Vieta's theorem itself easily follows from the notation: if we have a quadratic equation of the form then the sum of its roots is equal to the coefficient p taken with the opposite sign, and the product of the roots of the equation is equal to the free term q. The formulaic representation of the above will look like If in a classical equation the constant a is nonzero, then you need to divide the entire equation by it, and then apply Vieta’s theorem.

Factoring quadratic equation schedule

Let the task be set: factor a quadratic equation. To do this, we first solve the equation (find the roots). Next, we substitute the found roots into the expansion formula for the quadratic equation. This will solve the problem.

Quadratic equation problems

Task 1. Find the roots of a quadratic equation

x^2-26x+120=0 .

Solution: Write down the coefficients and substitute them into the discriminant formula

Root of given value is equal to 14, it is easy to find with a calculator, or remember with frequent use, however, for convenience, at the end of the article I will give you a list of squares of numbers that can often be encountered in such problems.
We substitute the found value into the root formula

and we get

Task 2. Solve the equation

2x 2 +x-3=0.

Solution: We have a complete quadratic equation, write out the coefficients and find the discriminant


Using known formulas we find the roots of the quadratic equation

Task 3. Solve the equation

9x 2 -12x+4=0.

Solution: We have a complete quadratic equation. Determining the discriminant

We got a case where the roots coincide. Find the values ​​of the roots using the formula

Task 4. Solve the equation

x^2+x-6=0 .

Solution: In cases where there are small coefficients for x, it is advisable to apply Vieta’s theorem. By its condition we obtain two equations

From the second condition we find that the product must be equal to -6. This means that one of the roots is negative. We have the following possible pair of solutions (-3;2), (3;-2) . Taking into account the first condition, we reject the second pair of solutions.
The roots of the equation are equal

Problem 5. Find the lengths of the sides of a rectangle if its perimeter is 18 cm and its area is 77 cm 2.

Solution: Half the perimeter of a rectangle is equal to the sum of its adjacent sides. Let's denote x – big side, then 18-x its smaller side. The area of ​​the rectangle is equal to the product of these lengths:
x(18-x)=77;
or
x 2 -18x+77=0.
Let's find the discriminant of the equation

Calculating the roots of the equation

If x=11, That 18's=7 , the opposite is also true (if x=7, then 21's=9).

Problem 6. Factor the quadratic equation 10x 2 -11x+3=0.

Solution: Let's calculate the roots of the equation, to do this we find the discriminant

We substitute the found value into the root formula and calculate

We apply the formula for decomposing a quadratic equation by roots

Opening the brackets we obtain an identity.

Quadratic equation with parameter

Example 1. At what parameter values A , does the equation (a-3)x 2 + (3-a)x-1/4=0 have one root?

Solution: By direct substitution of the value a=3 we see that it has no solution. Next, we will use the fact that with a zero discriminant the equation has one root of multiplicity 2. Let's write out the discriminant

Let's simplify it and equate it to zero

We have obtained a quadratic equation with respect to the parameter a, the solution of which can be easily obtained using Vieta’s theorem. The sum of the roots is 7, and their product is 12. By simple search we establish that the numbers 3,4 will be the roots of the equation. Since we already rejected the solution a=3 at the beginning of the calculations, the only correct one will be - a=4. Thus, for a=4 the equation has one root.

Example 2. At what parameter values A , the equation a(a+3)x^2+(2a+6)x-3a-9=0 has more than one root?

Solution: Let's first consider the singular points, they will be the values ​​a=0 and a=-3. When a=0, the equation will be simplified to the form 6x-9=0; x=3/2 and there will be one root. For a= -3 we obtain the identity 0=0.
Let's calculate the discriminant

and find the value of a at which it is positive

From the first condition we get a>3. For the second, we find the discriminant and roots of the equation


Let us determine the intervals where the function takes positive values. By substituting the point a=0 we get 3>0 . So, outside the interval (-3;1/3) the function is negative. Don't forget the point a=0, which should be excluded because the original equation has one root in it.
As a result, we obtain two intervals that satisfy the conditions of the problem

There will be many similar tasks in practice, try to figure out the tasks yourself and do not forget to take into account the conditions that are mutually exclusive. Study the formulas for the solution well quadratic equations, they are quite often needed in calculations in various tasks and sciences.

First level

Quadratic equations. Comprehensive guide (2019)

In the term “quadratic equation,” the key word is “quadratic.” This means that the equation must necessarily contain a variable (that same x) squared, and there should not be xes to the third (or greater) power.

The solution of many equations comes down to solving quadratic equations.

Let's learn to determine that this is a quadratic equation and not some other equation.

Example 1.

Let's get rid of the denominator and multiply each term of the equation by

Let's move everything to the left side and arrange the terms in descending order of powers of X

Now we can say with confidence that this equation is quadratic!

Example 2.

Multiply the left and right sides by:

This equation, although it was originally in it, is not quadratic!

Example 3.

Let's multiply everything by:

Scary? The fourth and second degrees... However, if we make a replacement, we will see that we have a simple quadratic equation:

Example 4.

It seems to be there, but let's take a closer look. Let's move everything to the left side:

You see, it has shrunk - and now it's simple linear equation!

Now try to determine for yourself which of the following equations are quadratic and which are not:

Examples:

Answers:

1. square;
2. square;
3. not square;
4. not square;
5. not square;
6. square;
7. not square;
8. square.

Mathematicians conventionally divide all quadratic equations into the following types:

• Complete quadratic equations- equations in which the coefficients and, as well as the free term c, are not equal to zero (as in the example). In addition, among complete quadratic equations there are given- these are equations in which the coefficient (the equation from example one is not only complete, but also reduced!)

• Incomplete quadratic equations- equations in which the coefficient and or the free term c are equal to zero:

  They are incomplete because they are missing some element. But the equation must always contain x squared!!! Otherwise, it will no longer be a quadratic equation, but some other equation.

Why did they come up with such a division? It would seem that there is an X squared, and okay. This division is determined by the solution methods. Let's look at each of them in more detail.

Solving incomplete quadratic equations

First, let's focus on solving incomplete quadratic equations - they are much simpler!

There are types of incomplete quadratic equations:

1. , in this equation the coefficient is equal.
2. , in this equation the free term is equal to.
3. , in this equation the coefficient and the free term are equal.

1. i. Since we know how to take the square root, let's express from this equation

The expression can be either negative or positive. A squared number cannot be negative, because when multiplying two negative or two positive numbers, the result will always be a positive number, so: if, then the equation has no solutions.

And if, then we get two roots. There is no need to memorize these formulas. The main thing is that you must know and always remember that it cannot be less.

Let's try to solve some examples.

Example 5:

Solve the equation

Now all that remains is to extract the root from the left and right sides. After all, you remember how to extract roots?

Answer:

Never forget about roots with a negative sign!!!

Example 6:

Solve the equation

Answer:

Example 7:

Solve the equation

Oh! The square of a number cannot be negative, which means that the equation

no roots!

For such equations that have no roots, mathematicians came up with a special icon - (empty set). And the answer can be written like this:

Answer:

Thus, this quadratic equation has two roots. There are no restrictions here, since we did not extract the root.
Example 8:

Solve the equation

Let's take the common factor out of brackets:

Thus,

This equation has two roots.

Answer:

The simplest type of incomplete quadratic equations (although they are all simple, right?). Obviously, this equation always has only one root:

We will dispense with examples here.

Solving complete quadratic equations

We remind you that a complete quadratic equation is an equation of the form equation where

Solving complete quadratic equations is a little more difficult (just a little) than these.

Remember, Any quadratic equation can be solved using a discriminant! Even incomplete.

The other methods will help you do it faster, but if you have problems with quadratic equations, first master the solution using the discriminant.

1. Solving quadratic equations using a discriminant.

Solving quadratic equations using this method is very simple; the main thing is to remember the sequence of actions and a couple of formulas.

If, then the equation has a root. Special attention take a step. Discriminant () tells us the number of roots of the equation.

• If, then the formula in the step will be reduced to. Thus, the equation will only have a root.
• If, then we will not be able to extract the root of the discriminant at the step. This indicates that the equation has no roots.

Let's go back to our equations and look at some examples.

Example 9:

Solve the equation

Step 1 we skip.

Step 2.

We find the discriminant:

This means the equation has two roots.

Step 3.

Answer:

Example 10:

Solve the equation

The equation is presented in standard form, so Step 1 we skip.

Step 2.

We find the discriminant:

This means that the equation has one root.

Answer:

Example 11:

Solve the equation

The equation is presented in standard form, so Step 1 we skip.

Step 2.

We find the discriminant:

This means we will not be able to extract the root of the discriminant. There are no roots of the equation.

Now we know how to correctly write down such answers.

Answer: no roots

2. Solving quadratic equations using Vieta's theorem.

If you remember, there is a type of equation that is called reduced (when the coefficient a is equal to):

Such equations are very easy to solve using Vieta’s theorem:

Sum of roots given quadratic equation is equal, and the product of the roots is equal.

Example 12:

Solve the equation

This equation can be solved using Vieta's theorem because .

The sum of the roots of the equation is equal, i.e. we get the first equation:

And the product is equal to:

Let's compose and solve the system:

• And. The amount is equal to;
• And. The amount is equal to;
• And. The amount is equal.

and are the solution to the system:

Answer: ; .

Example 13:

Solve the equation

Answer:

Example 14:

Solve the equation

The equation is given, which means:

Answer:

QUADRATIC EQUATIONS. AVERAGE LEVEL

What is a quadratic equation?

In other words, a quadratic equation is an equation of the form, where - the unknown, - some numbers, and.

The number is called the highest or first coefficient quadratic equation, - second coefficient, A - free member.

Why? Because if the equation immediately becomes linear, because will disappear.

In this case, and can be equal to zero. In this chair equation is called incomplete. If all the terms are in place, that is, the equation is complete.

Solutions to various types of quadratic equations

Methods for solving incomplete quadratic equations:

First, let's look at methods for solving incomplete quadratic equations - they are simpler.

We can distinguish the following types of equations:

I., in this equation the coefficient and the free term are equal.

II. , in this equation the coefficient is equal.

III. , in this equation the free term is equal to.

Now let's look at the solution to each of these subtypes.

Obviously, this equation always has only one root:

A squared number cannot be negative, because when you multiply two negative or two positive numbers, the result will always be a positive number. That's why:

if, then the equation has no solutions;

if we have two roots

There is no need to memorize these formulas. The main thing to remember is that it cannot be less.

Examples:

Solutions:

Answer:

Never forget about roots with a negative sign!

The square of a number cannot be negative, which means that the equation

no roots.

To briefly write down that a problem has no solutions, we use the empty set icon.

Answer:

So, this equation has two roots: and.

Answer:

Let's take the common factor out of brackets:

The product is equal to zero if at least one of the factors is equal to zero. This means that the equation has a solution when:

So, this quadratic equation has two roots: and.

Example:

Solve the equation.

Solution:

Let's factor the left side of the equation and find the roots:

Answer:

Methods for solving complete quadratic equations:

1. Discriminant

Solving quadratic equations this way is easy, the main thing is to remember the sequence of actions and a couple of formulas. Remember, any quadratic equation can be solved using a discriminant! Even incomplete.

Did you notice the root from the discriminant in the formula for roots? But the discriminant can be negative. What to do? We need to pay special attention to step 2. The discriminant tells us the number of roots of the equation.

• If, then the equation has roots:
• If, then the equation has the same roots, and in fact, one root:

  Such roots are called double roots.

• If, then the root of the discriminant is not extracted. This indicates that the equation has no roots.

Why are different numbers of roots possible? Let us turn to the geometric meaning of the quadratic equation. The graph of the function is a parabola:

In a special case, which is a quadratic equation, . This means that the roots of a quadratic equation are the points of intersection with the abscissa axis (axis). A parabola may not intersect the axis at all, or may intersect it at one (when the vertex of the parabola lies on the axis) or two points.

In addition, the coefficient is responsible for the direction of the branches of the parabola. If, then the branches of the parabola are directed upward, and if, then downward.

Examples:

Solutions:

Answer:

Answer: .

Answer:

This means there are no solutions.

Answer: .

2. Vieta's theorem

It is very easy to use Vieta's theorem: you just need to choose a pair of numbers whose product is equal to the free term of the equation, and the sum is equal to the second coefficient taken with the opposite sign.

It is important to remember that Vieta's theorem can only be applied in reduced quadratic equations ().

Let's look at a few examples:

Example #1:

Solve the equation.

Solution:

This equation can be solved using Vieta's theorem because . Other coefficients: ; .

The sum of the roots of the equation is:

And the product is equal to:

Let's select pairs of numbers whose product is equal and check whether their sum is equal:

• And. The amount is equal to;
• And. The amount is equal to;
• And. The amount is equal.

and are the solution to the system:

Thus, and are the roots of our equation.

Answer: ; .

Example #2:

Solution:

Let's select pairs of numbers that give in the product, and then check whether their sum is equal:

and: they give in total.

and: they give in total. To obtain, it is enough to simply change the signs of the supposed roots: and, after all, the product.

Answer:

Example #3:

Solution:

The free term of the equation is negative, and therefore the product of the roots is a negative number. This is only possible if one of the roots is negative and the other is positive. Therefore the sum of the roots is equal to differences of their modules.

Let us select pairs of numbers that give in the product, and whose difference is equal to:

and: their difference is equal - does not fit;

and: - not suitable;

and: - not suitable;

and: - suitable. All that remains is to remember that one of the roots is negative. Since their sum must be equal, the root with the smaller modulus must be negative: . We check:

Answer:

Example #4:

Solve the equation.

Solution:

The equation is given, which means:

The free term is negative, and therefore the product of the roots is negative. And this is only possible when one root of the equation is negative and the other is positive.

Let's select pairs of numbers whose product is equal, and then determine which roots should have a negative sign:

Obviously, only the roots and are suitable for the first condition:

Answer:

Example #5:

Solve the equation.

Solution:

The equation is given, which means:

The sum of the roots is negative, which means that at least one of the roots is negative. But since their product is positive, it means both roots have a minus sign.

Let us select pairs of numbers whose product is equal to:

Obviously, the roots are the numbers and.

Answer:

Agree, it’s very convenient to come up with roots orally, instead of counting this nasty discriminant. Try to use Vieta's theorem as often as possible.

But Vieta’s theorem is needed in order to facilitate and speed up finding the roots. In order for you to benefit from using it, you must bring the actions to automaticity. And for this, solve five more examples. But don't cheat: you can't use a discriminant! Only Vieta's theorem:

Solutions to tasks for independent work:

Task 1. ((x)^(2))-8x+12=0

According to Vieta's theorem:

As usual, we start the selection with the piece:

Not suitable because the amount;

: the amount is just what you need.

Answer: ; .

Task 2.

And again our favorite Vieta theorem: the sum must be equal, and the product must be equal.

But since it must be not, but, we change the signs of the roots: and (in total).

Answer: ; .

Task 3.

Hmm... Where is that?

You need to move all the terms into one part:

The sum of the roots is equal to the product.

Okay, stop! The equation is not given. But Vieta's theorem is applicable only in the given equations. So first you need to give an equation. If you can’t lead, give up this idea and solve it in another way (for example, through a discriminant). Let me remind you that to give a quadratic equation means to make the leading coefficient equal:

Great. Then the sum of the roots is equal to and the product.

Here it’s as easy as shelling pears to choose: after all, it’s a prime number (sorry for the tautology).

Answer: ; .

Task 4.

The free member is negative. What's special about this? And the fact is that the roots will have different signs. And now, during the selection, we check not the sum of the roots, but the difference in their modules: this difference is equal, but a product.

So, the roots are equal to and, but one of them is minus. Vieta's theorem tells us that the sum of the roots is equal to the second coefficient with the opposite sign, that is. This means that the smaller root will have a minus: and, since.

Answer: ; .

Task 5.

What should you do first? That's right, give the equation:

Again: we select the factors of the number, and their difference should be equal to:

The roots are equal to and, but one of them is minus. Which? Their sum should be equal, which means that the minus will have a larger root.

Answer: ; .

Let me summarize:

1. Vieta's theorem is used only in the quadratic equations given.
2. Using Vieta's theorem, you can find the roots by selection, orally.
3. If the equation is not given or no suitable pair of factors of the free term is found, then there are no whole roots, and you need to solve it in another way (for example, through a discriminant).

3. Method for selecting a complete square

If all terms containing the unknown are represented in the form of terms from abbreviated multiplication formulas - the square of the sum or difference - then after replacing variables, the equation can be presented in the form of an incomplete quadratic equation of the type.

For example:

Example 1:

Solve the equation: .

Solution:

Answer:

Example 2:

Solve the equation: .

Solution:

Answer:

In general, the transformation will look like this:

This implies: .

Doesn't remind you of anything? This is a discriminatory thing! That's exactly how we got the discriminant formula.

QUADRATIC EQUATIONS. BRIEFLY ABOUT THE MAIN THINGS

Quadratic equation- this is an equation of the form, where - the unknown, - the coefficients of the quadratic equation, - the free term.

Complete quadratic equation- an equation in which the coefficients are not equal to zero.

Reduced quadratic equation- an equation in which the coefficient, that is: .

Incomplete quadratic equation- an equation in which the coefficient and or the free term c are equal to zero:

• if the coefficient, the equation looks like: ,
• if there is a free term, the equation has the form: ,
• if and, the equation looks like: .

1. Algorithm for solving incomplete quadratic equations

1.1. An incomplete quadratic equation of the form, where, :

1) Let's express the unknown: ,

2) Check the sign of the expression:

• if, then the equation has no solutions,
• if, then the equation has two roots.

1.2. An incomplete quadratic equation of the form, where, :

1) Let’s take the common factor out of brackets: ,

2) The product is equal to zero if at least one of the factors is equal to zero. Therefore, the equation has two roots:

1.3. An incomplete quadratic equation of the form, where:

This equation always has only one root: .

2. Algorithm for solving complete quadratic equations of the form where

2.1. Solution using discriminant

1) Let's bring the equation to standard form: ,

2) Let's calculate the discriminant using the formula: , which indicates the number of roots of the equation:

3) Find the roots of the equation:

• if, then the equation has roots, which are found by the formula:
• if, then the equation has a root, which is found by the formula:
• if, then the equation has no roots.

2.2. Solution using Vieta's theorem

The sum of the roots of the reduced quadratic equation (equation of the form where) is equal, and the product of the roots is equal, i.e. , A.

2.3. Solution by the method of selecting a complete square